392
all to Goaldo and beat 11 prival!
fe vnkul De multnoup and of ebulla ut notasopo
Peak guang Dhool edt nå beviendo bet I
Jos,aprivigalm eidexablaron vidneta ngo ber
* Bi Agrow poitrate bra 8180 omezize orft to
ne nun-qon tetsøk ed? yď adrsinius to
74 90 g
ぶ
ad WRA
ent yd bedniogge est bra vawits
FOOTBA anidro) and 10% not
sma glukt was nobrod ni bableer en ode
Nuraneo vidwosont al e
01. mio berebiakoo ed sardoed abw #1 bra
or not?lacy aid berglset of d$85$ alda
and goom of bentosb ¡Y Ire
han gasit e molts tolins q yns mort bebuloze vigtitme
Fay .TM beners youe (190K ALP Si Jan? bejsennus bert I bus
Ds en ti eny to my mind, 32 (bib en boodanebnu I es) weiy
kind of bonetas son I æettutoridμA galxe T sild beatolni
de grob bar at ti baxas bus netdan
to enrico bouni?ror 9ft að bobulis ytsind osis W
- mah le .I bene: 1 bas secolq
lup 1897g el a foo amer's Suo mtut of bountinon fnið roðned
loat fremgart IBlendro14 au* tans sid÷dorq bersas al sold
110 Won son ne tw yalesfìtib o@ Idéneblanoo ni tisadi bait
meg a ko mid wat I
vione go ptal emao emados atolei
- vekt seantdo e Joniegs Misoeneng amid sit 38 new dofdw moit
el diumud eauso of 19**Lucien #@[olda guidel[dwq tot 1S (BG Balno
A al Gromsvoð ali? to subit øred end to toorg 4:44--.
dre: gtc) esert:00 on teleas of exiseb
24%. easily berto en I [181,[7gA bass To
I doje jasⱭ ya ni
end of Vit ste
ad I walvisini od! to etong e besolone bra stata to visdets62
10. At the close of the interview Mr. Wei Han asked if he might be supplied with a note of the points we had discussed, and it was in these circumstances that Mr. Clementi's letter of April 21st was written. It was handed to Mr. Wei Han and not sent through the post, and it formed an enclosure to my further Despatch 204 of 22nd May, 1911, to the Secretary of State of which a copy was transmitted to Your Excellency.
11. The point which had been raised by Mr. Wai wan regard- ing the place occupied by the Officer deputed by the Chinese Government to attend the trial in extradition cases, had as I have said been held over, for reference to my legal advisers. My reply was conveyed by Mr. Clementi in a demi-official letter dated May 9th which formed an enclosure to the same despatch. On reflection I admit that this was an error of judgment, and the reply should have been sent through the Consul-General with a full explanation of the circumstances in which the question had been raised. I much regret that this course was not
pursued.
12. In regard to the question of details in Police proce- dure for the suppression of crime, Mr. Wei Han replied in a demi-official note to the Colonial Secretary that the Viceroy accepted all the proposals made (enclosure iii in Despatch of 22nd May,
1911.)
13. On May 20th Mr. Jamieson was on my launch, and as I
was stepping ashore he mentioned the fact that he had seen a statement in the Press regarding these Police arrangements, and said that the fact of his not having been consulted or informed
of their progress had placed him in an awkward position. I
.bedioasb
at once apologised for my over-sight, and assured him emphatical-
ly that it had been due solely to accident and not to any desire
to eliminate him. I explained how the matter had grown up
informally
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.